Installing the last piece of stainless trim around the rear window is becoming
annoying to say the least. I pulled the equivalent piece from the parts car,
and it’s a perfect match for the one giving me fits. That led me to investigate
the rubber seal that earlier caused problems for the installer, and I believe
it’s the culprit again.
When compared to the old seal on the parts car, there are differences,
including profile measurements that might contribute to a poor fit. As I
mentioned in an earlier post, the edge of the trim nearest the glass is
designed to slip into a groove in the rubber, but there are dimensional
differences between new and old. Some deviances in shape can certainly be attributed
to time and weather affecting the old one in the parts car, but the depth and
width of the groove that concern this trim should be about the same, yet they
are substantially different. The slot in the old one has a depth of .26, while
the new Steele rubber measures .18. The internal width of the old piece is .10,
and the new is not really measurable, but my guesstimate is about .05. The way it is
shaped now, instead of slipping all the way into the groove, the trim edge
bottoms out so the rubber puts pressure on the trim and prevents it from slipping
into the proper position. I tried taking pictures, but they didn’t show enough
detail.
Meanwhile, I’ve put small wedges in the slot and I’ll leave them for a few days to see if they will help form the rubber to make the trim slip in easier.
Meanwhile, I’ve put small wedges in the slot and I’ll leave them for a few days to see if they will help form the rubber to make the trim slip in easier.
I feel guilty complaining about the quality of the seal,
since Steele is one of the few companies making restoration parts for our cars
and kudos to them. This is really the only part from them that has ever given me fit
issues. Usually they are equal to, or better fitting than aged NOS parts. Maybe
it’s just me, or maybe it’s the uniformity of cars from that era, but it definitely
is frustrating.
Not to be outdone in the annoyance department is the torque
converter. While waiting for the rubber seal to adjust, I decided to mate the engine and
transmission, but so far that hasn’t worked out too well either.
Many years ago, a Mopar friend who owned a transmission shop
told me the easy way to mate the TC to an aluminum TorqueFlite was to stand the
transmission on the tail shaft and spin the converter a few times until it drops
into the proper position. That has always worked well for me in the past so I never
felt a need to locate a factory alignment tool, but not this time! Usually a
half-dozen spins does the trick, but this time I spun that damn converter until
my fingers were raw and it still didn’t drop! I finally decided to call it a
day before I resorted to non-productive cursing.
With lots to do before company arrives for Thanksgiving, I
doubt I’ll have much time to get back to my latest re-build frustrations until
sometime next weekend.
So, thinking a little (very little) outside of the box, could the rubber groves be very carefully cut deeper / wider with a cutting wheel on a Dremel tool and I was not aware that there was a alignment tool for the auto-trans front pump dogs and converter notches (learn something new everyday). Under discloser, I'm not sure that I ever done a Mopar trans but on Ford and Chevy its spin and push horizontally until the big "clunk" noise and your fingers will not fit behind the converter. Kind of a leap of faith and worrisome until its running!
ReplyDeleteMaybe someone could modify the groove, but not with my shaky old hands! I'd break the glass, or destroy the rubber. I checked the results of wedging the groove open, and it's looking a little better. Maybe by the time I can get back to it the situation will improve.
ReplyDelete